SHould LASF be allowed to retain rights to Paul Maholm after the trade?
YES
100%
[ 2 ]
NO
0%
[ 0 ]
Total Votes : 2
Poll closed
Author
Message
THE KILLERS UTILITY MAN
Posts : 143 Join date : 2007-12-12 Age : 44
Subject: RETAIN MAHOLM? Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:59 pm
AW contends LASF be allowed to retain rights Maholm until Baldelli is put on the DL after the trade is complete.
Bayside Sluggers MINOR LEAGUER
Posts : 28 Join date : 2007-12-19 Age : 34 Location : West Bloomfield, MI
Subject: Re: RETAIN MAHOLM? Thu Mar 13, 2008 6:59 pm
Sure; I dont understand why LA did that deal again. Although I understand his intention was to be a nice and all, but it is not his fault. But for that sure he can keep Maholm.
Where_My_Check MINOR LEAGUER
Posts : 41 Join date : 2008-01-04
Subject: Re: RETAIN MAHOLM? Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:37 pm
My vote is no, but it won't let me vote.
San Marcos Slurve MINOR LEAGUER
Posts : 29 Join date : 2007-12-18 Age : 51 Location : Brooklyn
Subject: Re: RETAIN MAHOLM? Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:11 pm
It won't let me vote either.
With apologies to the parties, I'm gonna have to vote no as well. Yahoo has their rules on how rosters and trades work, and we start a bad precident when we start circumventing that to suit our needs.
NeedleJuice MINOR LEAGUER
Posts : 24 Join date : 2007-12-20 Age : 46 Location : Charlotte, NC
Subject: Vote Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:02 am
No, it won't let me vote either. I agree with sticking within the rules. If we bend or stretch the rules here, people will try to stretch the rules from here on out.
Subject: RETAIN MAHOLM? 
Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:59 pm
